Advertising
The Harvard Crimson is the nation’s oldest continuously published daily college newspaper and the only daily publication of Cambridge, Massachusetts. We work with advertisers ranging from national companies to local businesses, from student recruiters to advertising agencies.
​
The media and advertising industry is a constantly changing landscape, and our business team is focused on innovative advertising solutions to stay ahead of the curve and deliver results to our clients.
By the Crimson Brand Studio
The AI That Won't Write Your Paper
(And Why That's Exactly What Students Need)
How academics built thesify to enhance learning rather than replace it
Written by: Alessandra Giugliano and Marc-Oliver Gewaltig
Academic writing demands clarity and precision - not only at Harvard. Yet the guidance and feedback students need to master the craft of academic writing remains frustratingly scarce. Professors are overwhelmed by teaching, research, and fund raising load, leaving little time for the detailed commentary that would help transform rough drafts into rigorous research writing.
​
thesify.ai is an AI academic writing assistant designed to fill this gap - not by writing for students, but by teaching them to think like experienced writers. Unlike AI tools that generate content, thesify provides structured feedback that helps students identify weaknesses in their arguments, evaluate their use of evidence, and understand disciplinary conventions.
​​
This distinction matters. While generative AI threatens to make students passive consumers of machine-written content, thesify.ai preserves the essential struggle of academic writing while providing the guidance students desperately need.
Feedback that Teaches Critical Thinking
When students upload a draft to thesify.ai, they receive what the platform calls a Pre-Submission Review - a comprehensive analysis based on academic rubrics rather than surface corrections of grammar and style. The AI evaluates whether the text follows academic conventions, assesses if the main message is clear and relevant, and identifies weak evidence and gaps in reasoning.
Example of thesify’s real-time margin-style feedback on a student draft.
"I started asking myself the right questions before hitting submit," explains Harvard graduate student Maya Patel. "thesify didn't just fix my thesis—it taught me to think like my advisor does when reading student work."
This pedagogical approach transforms feedback from corrective to developmental. Thus, students internalize this approach and learn to use it on assignments completed without AI assistance.
​
Thesify’s feedback comes as a downloadable report, making the AI's guidance transparent to instructors while helping students track their progress across multiple revisions and assignments. This transparency addresses legitimate concerns about academic integrity while demonstrating that AI can enhance rather than undermine educational goals.
Downloadable feedback report showing structured guidance and recommendations.
Discipline-Specific Standards
Academic writing varies dramatically across fields. A political science student may need feedback on operationalizing variables while a literature student may need guidance on textual analysis. thesify addresses this by asking students to specify their assignment type, field, and purpose before generating feedback. Thus, students receive tailored advice allowing them to learn the specific standards and conventions for rigorous work in their discipline.
​
A Professor from the U.K. observed the difference: "Students who use thesify submit drafts with more sophisticated arguments. They're not just making claims - they're making statements that matter."
Research Support Without Shortcuts
thesify's Paper Digest exemplifies the platform's educational philosophy. Rather than summarizing articles for students, it teaches efficient source evaluation. Students still read, analyze, and synthesize, but can identify relevant sources more quickly and understand complex theoretical arguments more readily.
​
PhD student Alex Chen describes the impact: "Instead of drowning in abstracts, I could quickly identify which papers challenged my assumptions. It helped me find the conversation I wanted to join, not just sources to cite."
​
This approach preserves the intellectual work of research while providing a scaffold for improvement - exactly what educational AI should accomplish.
Honest Assessment of Limitations
thesify's approach isn't without challenges. Some students initially find the comprehensive feedback overwhelming. "My first report felt like getting ten reviews at once," admits undergraduate Sarah Kim. "I had to learn how to prioritize the suggestions."
​
Faculty concerns about AI dependency also deserve consideration. Will students become reliant on external validation rather than developing internal critical judgment? Early user experiences suggest that students who use thesify as a learning tool also show improvement in independent work.
​
At $29.99 annually, thesify remains more affordable than many other AI tools and also private tutoring, but students from low-income backgrounds may still find it prohibitive.
​
A Model for Educational AI
As universities grapple with AI's role in education, thesify offers a promising model. By focusing on feedback rather than generation, thus preserving student agency while providing guidance, it suggests how artificial intelligence might enhance rather than replace learning.
​
Students and researchers can explore thesify at thesify.ai.
thesify’s Paper Digest condenses dense texts to check understanding and citation value.